Home/Compare/Build vs Buy vs Embed
Compare · Build vs Buy vs Embed

Build, buy, or embed?

Three ways to source AI capability — each right in different situations. Here’s an honest framework for choosing, including the cases where embedding isn’t the answer.

The three options

Each is right — somewhere.

Build in-house

Best when
Best when AI is core to your product and you can hire and retain senior AI engineers.
Watch out
Slow and expensive to staff; hard to hire; you carry the reliability burden alone.

Buy off-the-shelf

Best when
Best when a commodity workflow fits a mature SaaS product almost exactly.
Watch out
Generic by design; your edge cases and data model rarely fit; limited control.

Embed a partner

Best when
Best when you need a specific workflow shipped fast, built into your stack, and kept reliable.
Watch out
Not the move if the need is trivial, or if you must own deep in-house capability long term.
Side by side

The same five questions, three ways.

Dimension
Gigabit
Buy / Build
Speed to production
Weeks
Days to deploy, but generic · Months to hire and ramp
Fit to your stack
Built into your systems
Whatever the vendor allows · Fully custom, eventually
Reliability ownership
Partner operates it
Vendor SLA, limited control · Entirely on you
Cost shape
Fixed-price project
Per-seat / usage subscription · Salaries + ramp + retention
Best when
A specific workflow, shipped & owned
A commodity need fits exactly · AI is core and you can hire
The anti-positioning

We’ll say it plainly: if AI is core to your product and you can hire senior engineers, build in-house. If a commodity tool fits your need exactly, buy it. Embed a partner like Gigabit when you need a specific workflow shipped fast and kept reliable — often as the bridge to building in-house.

Compare FAQ

Build vs buy vs embed, answered

Should we build an in-house AI team or embed a partner?

Build in-house when AI is core to your product, the work is continuous, and you can actually hire and retain senior AI engineers — which is hard and slow right now. Embed a forward-deployed partner like Gigabit when you need a specific workflow shipped fast and kept reliable, without carrying the full hiring and reliability burden yourself. Many teams embed first to ship, then build in-house capability over time.

When is buying an off-the-shelf tool the right call?

When your need is a commodity workflow that a mature SaaS product already does almost exactly, and you don’t need deep customization or control. The moment your edge cases, data model, or integrations matter, off-the-shelf starts to strain.

Can Gigabit help us build in-house capability, not just deliver?

Yes. Our Embedded AI Teams work alongside your engineers and level them up as they ship — so embedding can be a bridge to in-house capability, not a dependency.

What's the fastest path to a working AI system?

Embedding. A forward-deployed partner can have a production workflow live in weeks, versus months to hire a team or the generic constraints of an off-the-shelf tool.

Decide with us

Not sure which path fits?

Tell us the workflow and the constraints. We’ll give you an honest read — even when the answer is build or buy.